leezard

All of the pictures work fine for me. I tried about 6 different catagories and about 10-12 different pictures, all of them opened in a new window and displayed perfectly.

oh yeah, password was uppercase username was all lower case, one of the tech support ppl is on AIM right now if you have it, log on and talk to them screenname is totalchoiceguru

Are you using the name and password you got in your welcome e-mail with all of the account details? Also. it is case sensative, should be all in lower case.

If i remember correctly it should be http://64.246.56.60/cpanel also, thats the IP for server 27 so you could also use http://server27.totalchoichosting.com/cpanel

I dunno why but that seriously cracked me up! anyway, i dont claim to know much about hacking, just that there is a way around everything. I agree with you about having to actually have access to a system to do anything to it but trojans get spread every day on all of the p2p sharing programs already. If the government wanted to it wouldnt be hard to get some of their own trojans out there on those networks, not that the government would ever do something sneaky like that. to me the real issue is not whether they COULD do it, but that they even consider it. Hmmm lets make all these anti hacking laws and throw people in jail for hacking, but then lets do the same thing (breaking their own anti hacking laws) to stop teenagers from downloading music. Personally i think the opposition will shoot it down and it will never happen, but who knows.

Thats not true, for every technology for preventing hacking, theres another technology for getting around it. The person that says something is foolproof is only fooling themselves. When i worked at microsoft i had friends that were ex hackers that worked for microsoft just trying to break in to stuff. I garantee any system can be cracked with the right resources. Besides, the system the government would be "hacking" if they tried something like this are mostly 15 year old kids that as far as they know there netgear router with a built in firewall is top of the line. Anyway thats not the point, IF the government tried to implement something like this they would be breaking the anti hacking laws that THEY set up. sorry if it sounds like i'm singleing you out, i'm not....i just have a few ummmm....."friends" that know a little more than they should about cracking systems Anyway my post has done what it was intended for, stirred up some friendly debate /go me!! As far as musicians go, they are devided pretty equally. some feel MP3 sharing is bad (thats mostly the ones that already have more money than god but there popularity has slipped *cough* Metallica *cough*) and then theres the new struggling musicians that feel "Hey, i dont care how you get it, listen to my stuff" I find it kind of funny, that Metallica, the band that pretty much started all this MP3 business back with napster used to THANK their fans for passing around tapes they recorded at home because it made their popularity spread across the country seemingly over night. Then after a few albums that only sold 3-4 million instead of 15-20 they start suing ppl. do i have MP3's? yeah...thousands of them, but i own a copy of EVERY CD that they are all from.

It's the US government, I bet they have some pretty smart people working for them.

my pr keeps changing from 4 to 0 shutup

Macintosh is working on a PC useable iTunes, no idea when it will be available.

I agree with both of your statements, but MP3 downloading is probably going to ALWAYS be around. Destroying someones computer isnt the way to stop it. Macintosh's iTunes sells downloadable liscensed songs for 99 cents each, they claim they sold over 2 million songs in the first 16 days they were in operation. Subscription services obviously dont work, why pay 10-20 dollars a month for being able to download a limited amount of songs per month that CAN'T be burned to a CD? Macintosh has the right idea, most ppl would pay 99 cents for a song, I would. most of the time when i buy a CD it's because i like 1 or 2 songs and I never listen to the rest of the CD. and if you think about it, 99 cents a song on average theres 12-15 songs on a CD if you bought all the songs on the CD 12-15 dollars is a good price.

Senator: Trash illegal downloaders' PCs WASHINGTON (AP) -- Illegally download copyright music from the Internet once, or even twice, and you get a warning. Do it a third time, and your computer gets destroyed. That's the suggestion made by the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee at a Tuesday hearing on copyright abuse, reflecting a growing frustration in Congress over failure of the technology and entertainment industries to protect copyrights in a digital age. The surprise statement by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, that he favors developing technology to remotely destroy computers used for illegal downloads represents a dramatic escalation in the increasingly contentious rhetoric over pirated music. Protected by anti-hack laws During a discussion of methods to frustrate computer users who illegally exchange music and movie files over the Internet, Hatch asked technology executives about ways to damage computers involved in such file trading. Legal experts have said any such attack would violate federal anti-hacking laws. "No one is interested in destroying anyone's computer," replied Randy Saaf of MediaDefender Inc., a secretive Los Angeles company that builds technology to deliberately download pirated material very slowly so other users can't. "I'm interested," Hatch interrupted. He said damaging someone's computer "may be the only way you can teach somebody about copyrights." The senator, a composer who earned $18,000 last year in song-writing royalties, acknowledged Congress would have to enact an exemption for copyright owners from liability for damaging computers. He endorsed technology that would twice warn a computer user about illegal online behavior, "then destroy their computer." "If we can find some way to do this without destroying their machines, we'd be interested in hearing about that," Hatch said. "If that's the only way, then I'm all for destroying their machines. If you have a few hundred thousand of those, I think people would realize" the seriousness of their actions. Urging action Some legal experts suggested Hatch's provocative remarks were more likely intended to compel technology and music executives to work faster toward ways to protect copyrights online than to signal forthcoming legislation. "It's just the frustration of those who are looking at enforcing laws that are proving very hard to enforce," said Orin Kerr, a George Washington University law professor and former Justice Department cybercrimes prosecutor. Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the committee's senior Democrat, later said the problem is serious but called Hatch's suggestion too drastic. "The rights of copyright holders need to be protected, but some Draconian remedies that have been suggested would create more problems than they would solve," Leahy said in a statement. "We need to work together to find the right answers, and this is not one of them." Rep. Rick Boucher, D-Virginia, urged Hatch to reconsider. Because Hatch is Judiciary chairman, "we all take those views very seriously," he said. But Kerr said Congress was unlikely to approve any bill to enable such remote computer destruction by copyright owners "because innocent users might be wrongly targeted." Escalating the fight A spokesman for the Recording Industry Association of America, Jonathan Lamy, said Hatch was "apparently making a metaphorical point that if peer-to-peer networks don't take reasonable steps to prevent massive copyright infringement on the systems they create, Congress may be forced to consider stronger measures." The RIAA represents the major music labels. The entertainment industry has gradually escalated its fight against Internet file-traders, targeting the most egregious pirates with civil lawsuits. The RIAA recently won a federal court decision making it significantly easier to identify and track consumers -- even those hiding behind aliases -- using popular Internet file-sharing software.

You normally get a prompt asking if you want top open the file or save it to a disk. At least thats always been my experience.

thats awesome!!! Go TCH!!!! Rock Sign Rock Sign Rock Sign Rock Sign Rock Sign

did it work before and just quit?

there is a file attachment mod for phpbb, it requires a little bit of rewriting of parts of the code, but isn;t to bad. you can get it at www.phpbb.com also as for nuke and phpbb working together, the newer version of nuke downloaded from phpnuke.org use the phpbb. if you installed the one from cpanel it uses the splat forums. if you install nuke 6.5 from phpnuke.org it will have phpbb built in to it, so when your users register/login they are already registered/logged in to the forums as well. One draw back to this, and the reson i use a standalone phpbb is with thephpnuke version the forums open within the nuke site, so its a smaller window.

Yeah, I visit a lot of forums, and any time someone asks about hosting I point out TCH. Lots of favorable response. Someone that i've just started working with actually just switched to TCH http://www.thebestcasescenario.com

Yeah i noticed the google bot has been hitting my site almost daily, nothing big yet...3-4mb but it's a start.

Subdomains have to be relevant to your main site, for example you have www.cars.com a site all about cars and you want a blog site called blog.cars.com that would be ok as long as the blog is about cars, working on cars, restoring cars etc. If the blog was about anything other than cars, or had no relation to the main site it is against the AUP. I have two subdomains forum.x-trememodz.com and kardonskorner.x-trememodz.com the forum sub is for my community forum and the other one is for gaming reviews. As far as the club thing, I'm pretty sure hosting someone elses site on your space is against the AUP, even if you do maintain it.

and heres a link to what microsoft has to say http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=138053

I found this on google, give it a try and see if it helps. Ever wonder where WINMAIL.DAT attachments come from? It's a Microsoft Exchange "feature". Since Exchange supports rich-text email (bold, italic, multiple fonts, etc.), and Internet email doesn't, any email sent from Exchange to a non-Exchange mail reader will contain an Attachment called WINMAIL.DAT. If you use Exchange, you won't see this file, and the message will retain its formatting. However, it can be confusing for those who don't use Exchange (You, I, and the majority of the Internet population), and have no use for this file. In MS Outlook and Outlook Express: On the Tools menu, click Options, and then click the Mail Format (or "Send") tab. Under the Send tab is the message format list, select Plain Text or HTML(NOT Rich Text Format), and then click OK. let me know if that works, there were several sites about this issue and that was the first one i saw that gave some type of fix.

I was messing around in cpanel and notice the read webmail option at the bottom so i click on it to see what i can see.. 434 messages all saying the same thing Subject: Cron <x-treme@server23> 0 * * * * fetch -o - http://www.x-trememodz.com/phpadds/mainten...maintenance.php All headers /bin/sh: 0: command not found I'm pretty sure i'm using the wrong tool to process the script, which one does TCH support fetch, curl,lynx or wget? thanks in advance

conga rats turtle!

I would check and make sure that the files werent just copied from one folder to the other, If you have the files in two locations you SHOULD be able to delete the ones that arent in your public_html folder

Well i'm going to try and get my job back at the phone company tomorrow, they are re hiring agaiin so theres a good chance I'll get it. Being unemployed bites the big one!!

The php chat is a breeze to set up, and it seems to load a bit faster than the html/java chat