makaveli Posted May 28, 2006 Posted May 28, 2006 ok so im looking at the news... A geneticist, a philosopher and a chicken farmer say they have found the answer to a great evolutionary puzzle. The experts looked at the evidence in the long-standing debate over which came first - the chicken or the egg - and opted for the egg. Professor John Brookfield, a genetics expert from Nottingham University, said the first chicken must have started out as an embryo in an egg. This means the organism in the eggshell would have the same DNA as the chicken. He explained that the reason was due to the fact that genetic material does not change during an animal's life. Professor Brookfield said: "The first living thing which we could say unequivocally was a member of the species would be this first egg, so I would conclude that the egg came first." Kangaroo eggs Professor David Papineau, an expert in the philosophy of science at King's College, London agreed that the first chicken came from an egg and this proves there were chicken eggs before chickens. "I would argue it is a chicken egg if it has a chicken in it," said Prof Papineau. "If a kangaroo laid an egg from which an ostrich hatched, that would surely be an ostrich egg, not a kangaroo egg," he added. Charles Bournes, chairman of trade body Great British Chicken, said "Eggs were around long before the first chicken arrived. "Of course they may not have been chicken eggs as we see them today but they were eggs," he said. Professor Brooke added the debate could finally be laid to rest. what do you people Think??? Quote
makaveli Posted May 29, 2006 Author Posted May 29, 2006 yes, but where did the egg come from (this debate is quite 'hot' on another forum, weve got into evoloution, the big bang theory, and the 7 day theory, sheer brilliance! ) Quote
LF from MC Posted May 29, 2006 Posted May 29, 2006 Well, it couldn't have been the 'Big Bang' because it would have broken the egg.. Quote
makaveli Posted May 29, 2006 Author Posted May 29, 2006 you see evoloution.. yeah ok.. boils down to simple ameoba and bacteria.. yes i got that. but where did the lowest life forms evolve from... it then led to all about the gasses in the big bang, ok.. so where did these gases come from, where where they created, it seems illogical for them to of "been there all along" Quote
Deverill Posted May 29, 2006 Posted May 29, 2006 My question is, isn't "fact that genetic material does not change during an animal's life." contrary to the whole evolution thing? Doesn't it assume that it never can happen because we've never witnessed it evolve? And what about the aliens... couldn't they have zapped a crow and made it into a chicken? Seriously, people like these so called researchers bug me when they try to prove something as science, which heaven forbid has to be based on facts and not faith, and they use assumptions like that as fact. Anyway, that's all I got to say about it so there! Quote
makaveli Posted May 29, 2006 Author Posted May 29, 2006 i would like to see research go to more purposeful (is that a word lol) things, keep the fun for tea breaks. i think when time travel is invented and when we are all like Doctor Who we can go back and see what really happened, or we can go to the year 5,000,000,000 and see the world end - note - Doctor Who is a classic British TV show brought back for modern times bbc.co.uk/doctorwho - its quite good, im not sure if the BBC chanels stateside are showing the last series with Chritopher ecclestone yet, or you guys are still getting 80's things and classics like fawlty towers Quote
LF from MC Posted May 29, 2006 Posted May 29, 2006 Seriously, people like these so called researchers bug me Me too Quote
TCH-Dick Posted May 29, 2006 Posted May 29, 2006 Who cares which one came first, they both taste good fried. Quote
makaveli Posted May 29, 2006 Author Posted May 29, 2006 nahh egg scrambled, and chicken is good on a BBQ or roast and maybe chicken was first, as chicken aappears first in a dictionary Quote
chatbug Posted May 29, 2006 Posted May 29, 2006 He explained that the reason was due to the fact that genetic material does not change during an animal's life. Not exactly - tumor/cancer is a result of multitudes of genetic changes. If that occurs in a single-celled organism, then the genetic material has changed for that organism's life. Quote
Deverill Posted May 29, 2006 Posted May 29, 2006 we can go back and see what really happened, or we can go to the year 5,000,000,000 and see the world end Do you think the Bad Wolf maybe genetically engineered eggs? Chicken's great on the grill, but the eggs just drop through and make a mess. Quote
makaveli Posted May 30, 2006 Author Posted May 30, 2006 so does bacon, i did that in a BBQ... dont ask Quote
LF from MC Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 Geez, it's so easy to put backon, and eggs on the grill. just put them in a little fry pan... Quote
Deverill Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 I tried that but the plastic handle melted and got all over the grill... boy did that stink! Quote
LF from MC Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 You mean you didn't take the handle off first???? Quote
makaveli Posted May 30, 2006 Author Posted May 30, 2006 or you could use a sheet of metal! i suppose for them! Quote
perfectdreams Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 Who cares which one came first, they both taste good fried. *snort* Just had to comment on that, and agree whole-heartedly. YUM! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.