youneverknow Posted June 27, 2008 Posted June 27, 2008 Ran across this in the Register. I didn't know by using the free anti-virus software(especially the malware scanner) that I was part of this problem. Here is a partial quote from the article...."Daniel Brandt, who runs Wikipedia Watch, estimates that LinkScanner traffic to the site has outstripped legitimate clicks by nearly ten times. In this graph, the pink line represents suspected LinkScanner scans, the blue line legitimate clicks" and this..."Because the scanner attempts to disguise itself as a real live human click, webmasters who rely on log files for their traffic numbers may be unaware their stats are skewed. And others complain that LinkScanner has added extra dollars to their bandwidth bill." the full article is here. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/26/av...traffic_as_ie6/ youneverknow Quote
stevesh Posted June 28, 2008 Posted June 28, 2008 Turning off Link Scanner was the first thing I did after installing AVG 8. Noticable slowdown when surfing the Web. Quote
faran Posted July 26, 2009 Posted July 26, 2009 It doesn't do well on either front. It's a poor substitute for WOT (Web Of Trust) and doesn't check as well as the Finjan add-on. like what WOT uses, and looking for malicious code in a web page does not equate to discovering malicious intent (good code can still be malicious). I gave up on both (and Linkscanner, too) since they are not very protective but rather too paranoid than factual. Quote
Gold Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 It was a sure thing that AVG makes the surfing slower, but protected.. WHich should be the priority? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.