Andy, I had meant to do so, but neglected. Here are the headers.
Some interesting things:
1. I put a weight of 4 on Bayes99, so I'm surprised that this message only gets to 4.2 points in total.
2. DRUGS_ERECTILE is not a standard SpamAssassin 3.x test -- see http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_0_x.html. Is this a home-rolled test?
3. Notice that none of my tests (above) is referenced in the header. Reinforces my point #1 in my initial post.
Delivery-date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:10:36 -0400
Received: from DOMAIN by server10.totalchoicehosting.com with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.44)
for todd@DOMAIN.com; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:10:36 -0400
Received: from [184.108.40.206] (helo=juicedesign.ie)
by server10.totalchoicehosting.com with smtp (Exim 4.44)
for todd@DOMAIN.com; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:10:31 -0400
Received: from 220.127.116.11 by smtp.ios.nlh.no;
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:19:02 +0000
From: "Britney Farrell" <email@example.com>
Subject: Make your wife happy
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 07:18:31 -0700
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.2 required=5.5 tests=BAYES_99,DRUGS_ERECTILE