dvilloldo

Hi. Before now I thinking spamassassin filter don't work for mailman mailing lists. But now I can see the posts from a mailing list arrive through mailman to the subscriptors have spamassassin headers (X-Spam-Checker-Version, X-Spam-Level, X-Spam-Status). I need (as mailing lists administrator) to moderate ONE by ONE all the mails, and A LOT of spam arriving my mailing lists. Seems like spamassassin filter is AFTER the mailman moderation control. Is this right? Because maybe the solution is take out the moderation, and let spamassassin work by himself... Thanks.

Hi. GREAT!!! I just sending my ticket to request the move... And again, thanks for all... all you are a "model" of GOOD company (customer support, servers improve, technical level, response time, ....) Greetings from Spain.

Hi. But the european servers will have different prices... right? If the money difference is not little, maybe I will prefer to continue in the actual data centers, because my 2 main sites are not commercial, and I need to pay them all the years How about the possibility of moving the account in server35 to the other data center (the one of server26)? Thanks and greetings.

Hi. The first, I want to say I'm TCH customer since 20/5/2003 (proel334.net domain), and now I have 2 more accounts (grumpywolf.net and other one, commercial). And I'm really happy because I chose the more better option in hosting companies, for sure Well... about my question... I living in Spain, and most os my website visitor are from here. If i testing the access times to my websites, I can see a really BIG difference between my 2 main accounts (proel334.net and grumpywolf.net), and I know is because the servers (server26 and server35) are in different data centers. That difference is really big when browsing the sites, updating the information, making backups, and so on... For example, look the ping times from here: ---------------------------- >ping server35.totalchoicehosting.com Haciendo ping a server35.totalchoicehosting.com [69.50.193.13] con 32 bytes de datos: Respuesta desde 69.50.193.13: bytes=32 tiempo=246ms TTL=41 Respuesta desde 69.50.193.13: bytes=32 tiempo=244ms TTL=41 Respuesta desde 69.50.193.13: bytes=32 tiempo=278ms TTL=41 Respuesta desde 69.50.193.13: bytes=32 tiempo=236ms TTL=41 Estadísticas de ping para 69.50.193.13: Paquetes: enviados = 4, recibidos = 4, perdidos = 0 (0% perdidos), Tiempos aproximados de ida y vuelta en milisegundos: Mínimo = 236ms, Máximo = 278ms, Media = 251ms >ping server26.totalchoicehosting.com Haciendo ping a server26.totalchoicehosting.com [209.152.177.32] con 32 bytes de datos: Respuesta desde 209.152.177.32: bytes=32 tiempo=146ms TTL=47 Respuesta desde 209.152.177.32: bytes=32 tiempo=135ms TTL=47 Respuesta desde 209.152.177.32: bytes=32 tiempo=146ms TTL=47 Respuesta desde 209.152.177.32: bytes=32 tiempo=149ms TTL=47 Estadísticas de ping para 209.152.177.32: Paquetes: enviados = 4, recibidos = 4, perdidos = 0 (0% perdidos), Tiempos aproximados de ida y vuelta en milisegundos: Mínimo = 135ms, Máximo = 149ms, Media = 144ms ---------------------------- This results are "normal times": about 150 ms for server26, and 250 for server35... 66% more!!! So... my question is... can I ask TCH to change my account now located in server35 to other server located in the same data center as server26? And by the way... I waiting for news about European datacenters... I saw in other post about it, and i tried to ping to the first server in there... the result is amazing: ---------------------------- >ping uk1.totalchoicehosting.com Haciendo ping a uk1.totalchoicehosting.com [83.142.28.178] con 32 bytes de datos: Respuesta desde 83.142.28.178: bytes=32 tiempo=54ms TTL=50 Respuesta desde 83.142.28.178: bytes=32 tiempo=53ms TTL=50 Respuesta desde 83.142.28.178: bytes=32 tiempo=94ms TTL=50 Respuesta desde 83.142.28.178: bytes=32 tiempo=39ms TTL=50 Estadísticas de ping para 83.142.28.178: Paquetes: enviados = 4, recibidos = 4, perdidos = 0 (0% perdidos), Tiempos aproximados de ida y vuelta en milisegundos: Mínimo = 39ms, Máximo = 94ms, Media = 60ms ---------------------------- 60 ms!! guau!! No more, waiting for your answer... Greetings. Daniel Villoldo http://grumpywolf.net