kestaal.com

Thank you rick! Drew

You guys rock and I definatly want to stay with you for another year... Question... How do I re-up? I purchased on Aug 5 last year... Want to get it going for another one! Thanks! Drew

Ah, got ya. Oie! Then I would have to call their Tech Support! ICK! I'll try it again! Thanks guys! Rock Sign Drew

Well yes I have an ISP (Cable Modem). But I do not have an email account with them. That is why I have my own domain! I'll try the web mail. But I take it TCH cannot fix the MX record for reverse look up? Drew

Umm. I do not have an ISP account. Anyway to fix it? Or just kinda screwed? Looking at their page it says this: Mail servers without reverse-dns (i.e. the sending IP address does not resolve to a host name) will be blocked. Error Message: 553 sorry, your mailserver (XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX) is rejected. Reverse DNS queries for your mail server IP fail. Solution: Contact your ISP, mail, or DNS administrator D

I got this email error: Is this on my end? Or theirs? How can I fix it? Thanks! This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: palaaemon@citlink.net SMTP error from remote mailer after MAIL FROM:<drew@kestaal.com> SIZE=12375: host mx.frontiernet.net [66.133.128.227]: 553 sorry, your mailserver (69.50.193.13) is rejected. Reverse DNS queries for your mail server IP fail. See http://postmaster.frontiernet.net. ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------ Return-path: <drew@kestaal.com> Received: from host-66-205-127-7.classicnet.net ([66.205.127.7] helo=bigbuddha) by server35.totalchoicehosting.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B5lP3-0000NL-CF for palaaemon@citlink.net; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 05:53:09 -0700

Quick and easy as always! Thanks a ton! Rock Sign

The attachment is named kestaal.com stronghold.pdf or .zip That is the problem? D

Tonight I was trying to email out a PDF to a reviewer. I got this error... This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: patrik@genetics.med.harvard.edu This message has been rejected because it has a potentially executable attachment "Kestaal.com This form of attachment has been used by recent viruses or other malware. If you meant to send this file then please package it up as a zip file and resend it. Weird I thought... So I zipped it and got the same error... So I went on to the NEXT reviewer. This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: cgath@insight.rr.com This message has been rejected because it has a potentially executable attachment "Kestaal.com This form of attachment has been used by recent viruses or other malware. If you meant to send this file then please package it up as a zip file and resend it. Same thing! How odd I thought! Well, it must be me... This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: drewconrad@kestaal.com This message has been rejected because it has a potentially executable attachment "Kestaal.com This form of attachment has been used by recent viruses or other malware. If you meant to send this file then please package it up as a zip file and resend it. The only thing I can find on PDF viruses is: Security experts have found the first virus able to propagate through Adobe's encrypted portable document format (PDF) files, a format once thought to be virtually impenetrable. Named Peachy by experts at Web security firm McAfee on Tuesday, the email virus hides itself in PDF files and infects other computer systems by sending the file as an attachment through the Microsoft Outlook email program. The virus exploits a feature in Acrobat that combines other files with the PDF code. The virus is located in visual basic script contained in the PDF file and is launched when a user clicks on a peach icon located within the document. The virus travels in emails with random subject lines along with PDF attachments named "find.pdf," "peach.pdf," "find the peach.pdf," "find_the_peach.pdf," "joke.pdf," or "search.pdf," according to McAfee. An Argentine man with the handle Zulu claims to have written the virus in multiple postings on the Web. In one posting he refers to the virus as "OUTLOOK.PDFWorm" and says the virus was "designed to be proof of concept," demonstrating that PDF files are not as safe as previously thought. Although experts say that Peachy hasn't caused any damage, and isn't expected to, the virus has raised concerns about PDF, which in the past has been considered to be a very secure file format due to its use of encryption. McAfee says it will release a software update next week that can detect the Peachy virus. Posted August 8, 2001 That of course is from... 3 YEARS ago! I would appreicate if someone can give me a hand here. As I run a PDF business, this is pretty important to me. Thanks all! Drew Conrad kestaal.com

Ok one follow up question. What if I want to swap to two and have papajipooo.com be the primary and have kestaal.com point to it? is there a processing fee? Thanks! D

OK to make sure we are talking about the same thing here... I have kestaal.com right now. I want to get say papajijooo.com. If I want different content on Papajijoo.com than on kestaal.com I have to have a new package. But if I want to have papajijoooo.com simply forward traffic to kestaal.com, then that is called parked, and will not cost me more? Thanks! S

Hello! I have been with you for over 6 months, and I must say... No problems what so ever. I have the basic plan, 5gb a month. One Domain. What would it cost me to add a second domain into my plan? Do I have to get a completly new package? I am not using NEAR my limit at this time, so it seems wasteful! Thank you all in advance! Drew Conrad